The National Election was held yesterday. After 18 months of primaries, nomination
conventions, debates, print and television ads, it is finally over. It is time for people to throw away their lawn
signs, have billboards removed, and get back to regular commercials trying to
sell us products instead of telling us about candidates or issues.
In many ways the 2012 election was very much like every
other election. On a national level, it
was two candidates trying to convince the voters why their ideas are better or
maybe why the other candidate’s ideas won’t work. While every election has had its fair share
of negative campaigning, 2012 did prove to be one of the more vicious elections. Some believe it was this viciousness and lack
of enthusiasm with either candidate which caused voter turnout to dip lower
than 2008 and 2004. Voter turnout
nationally was around 57.5%.
What made 2012 somewhat different was the amount of money
spent. It is estimated between presidential
and congressional campaigns close to $5.8 billion was spent. This number astounds me. The primary parties responsible for the
increase in spending were the numerous Super-PACs (Political Action Committee). The
PACs won a U.S. Supreme Court case (Citizens United vs. Federal Election
Committee) which in essence states the spending of money on political campaigns
is the equivalent of free speech and should not be regulated or suppressed. As a result, while direct
spending by candidates and political parties was down in 2012, the Super-PAC
spending made this the most expensive election in the country’s history.
What do you think of our political process and American
politics? Do you like the ways elections
are conducted? Is there anything you
think should be changed about the process?
What is your reaction to the amount of money spent? Do you think it is money well spent or was it
excessive?








